firecrawlvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 196 430 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 537 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 7 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Winter CMS is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 537 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with