firecrawlvsvanilla-cookbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | vanilla-cookbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #13 of 18 in Recipe Management |
| GitHub stars | 196 605 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 262 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 13 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.6.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 46/100 for vanilla-cookbook, so it is the safer default.
vanilla-cookbook ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.
If you want the quickest setup, vanilla-cookbook is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 262 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →vanilla-cookbook details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep vanilla-cookbook, compare it with