firecrawlvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 196 535 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 192 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 192 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with