firecrawlvsUmlautAdaptarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | UmlautAdaptarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 196 605 | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 262 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 3 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.
firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for UmlautAdaptarr.
If you want the quickest setup, UmlautAdaptarr is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 262 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →UmlautAdaptarr details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep UmlautAdaptarr, compare it with