filestashvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| filestash | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 14 838 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +116 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
filestash scores 71/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, filestash is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
filestash is growing faster right now (+116 stars in 30 days).
filestash details →Scada-LTS details →