FeynmanvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Feynman | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 039 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.5.60 · 29 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Feynman scores 69/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Feynman ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, Feynman is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Feynman is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
Feynman details →Windows ARM details →