FeynmanvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Feynman | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 10 038 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 76 |
| Latest release | v0.5.60 · 29 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 69/100 for Feynman, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Feynman.
If you want the quickest setup, Feynman is easier to run; ToolJet needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
Feynman details →ToolJet details →