factovsTryton
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| facto | Tryton | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 11 in Accounting | #3 of 14 in ERP |
| GitHub stars | 372 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.32 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Scala | — |
Which one should you pick?
Tryton scores 68/100 against 44/100 for facto, so it is the safer default.
facto ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tryton.
facto details →Tryton details →
Swap a project
Keep facto, compare it with
Keep Tryton, compare it with