faasvsWagtail
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faas | Wagtail | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #3 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 26 254 | 20 594 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +89 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 19 |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | v8.0.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Wagtail scores 79/100 against 68/100 for faas, so it is the safer default.
Wagtail ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for faas.
If you want the quickest setup, Wagtail is easier to run; faas needs more configuration.
Wagtail is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).
faas details →Wagtail details →
Swap a project
Keep faas, compare it with
Keep Wagtail, compare it with