faasvsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faas | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 26 253 | 27 062 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +476 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 4 |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 68/100 for faas, so it is the safer default.
Typesense ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for faas.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; faas needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+476 stars in 30 days).
faas details →Typesense details →
Swap a project
Keep faas, compare it with
Keep Typesense, compare it with