faasvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faas | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 26 254 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 28 |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 68/100 for faas, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for faas.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; faas needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
faas details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep faas, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with