faasvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faas | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 26 253 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 19 |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
faas scores 68/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for faas.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; faas needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
faas details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep faas, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with