faasvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faas | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 26 253 | 393 247 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +2 899 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 37 |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 68/100 for faas, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for faas.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; faas needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 899 stars in 30 days).
faas details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep faas, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with