ezbookkeepingvsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ezbookkeeping | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 62 in Personal Finance | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 5 857 | 35 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +209 | +505 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 14 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 71/100 for ezbookkeeping, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ezbookkeeping.
If you want the quickest setup, ezbookkeeping is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+505 stars in 30 days).
ezbookkeeping details →qdrant details →
Swap a project
Keep ezbookkeeping, compare it with
Keep qdrant, compare it with