EzarrvsFish Speech
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ezarr | Fish Speech | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #42 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 1 090 | 33 454 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 55/100 for Ezarr, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Ezarr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).
Ezarr details →Fish Speech details →
Swap a project
Keep Ezarr, compare it with
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with