exportarrvsGoAccess
Two self-hosted Monitoring & observability projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| exportarr | GoAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 831 | 21 093 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +145 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
GoAccess scores 75/100 against 59/100 for exportarr, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, exportarr is easier to run; GoAccess needs more configuration.
GoAccess is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).
exportarr details →GoAccess details →All Monitoring & observability projects →
Swap a project
Keep exportarr, compare it with
Keep GoAccess, compare it with