exovsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| exo | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 48 072 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +437 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
exo scores 76/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
exo ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
exo is growing faster right now (+437 stars in 30 days).
exo details →Tube Archivist details →