etcdvsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| etcd | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 38 in Databases | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 52 431 | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.7.3 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
etcd scores 83/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
etcd ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for MikroDash.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; etcd needs more configuration.
etcd is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).
etcd details →MikroDash details →