ERPNextvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ERPNext | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 40 726 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 195 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 | 15 |
| Latest release | v16.53.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ERPNext scores 85/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
ERPNext ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for wyoming-piper.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; ERPNext needs more configuration.
ERPNext is growing faster right now (+1 195 stars in 30 days).
ERPNext details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep ERPNext, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with