ERPNextvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ERPNext | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 40 736 | 118 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 205 | +5 840 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 | 11 |
| Latest release | v16.53.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 85/100 for ERPNext, so it is the safer default.
ERPNext ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; ERPNext needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 840 stars in 30 days).
ERPNext details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep ERPNext, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with