ERPNextvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ERPNext | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 40 731 | 35 799 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 200 | +838 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 | 28 |
| Latest release | v16.53.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ERPNext scores 85/100 against 81/100 for SeaweedFS, so it is the safer default.
ERPNext ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; ERPNext needs more configuration.
ERPNext details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep ERPNext, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with