ERPNextvsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ERPNext | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 40 726 | 27 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 195 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 | 20 |
| Latest release | v16.53.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
ERPNext scores 85/100 against 79/100 for PostgREST, so it is the safer default.
ERPNext ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for PostgREST.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; ERPNext needs more configuration.
ERPNext is growing faster right now (+1 195 stars in 30 days).
ERPNext details →PostgREST details →
Swap a project
Keep ERPNext, compare it with
Keep PostgREST, compare it with