Entevstunesynctool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ente | tunesynctool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 29 717 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +672 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 1 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Ente scores 81/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.
If you want the quickest setup, Ente is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
Ente is growing faster right now (+672 stars in 30 days).
Ente details →tunesynctool details →
Swap a project
Keep Ente, compare it with
Keep tunesynctool, compare it with