EntevsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ente | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 29 722 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +662 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 6 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Ente scores 82/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Ente is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Ente is growing faster right now (+662 stars in 30 days).
Ente details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Ente, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with