EntevsQuestarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ente | Questarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 29 731 | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +671 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 7 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Ente scores 82/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; Ente needs more configuration.
Ente is growing faster right now (+671 stars in 30 days).
Ente details →Questarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Ente, compare it with
Keep Questarr, compare it with