Entevsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ente | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 29 722 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +662 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 11 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Ente scores 82/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Ente needs more configuration.
Ente is growing faster right now (+662 stars in 30 days).
Ente details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep Ente, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with