EncorevsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Encore | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 12 649 | 16 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +164 | +244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 31 |
| Latest release | v1.58.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 72/100 for Encore, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Encore.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Encore needs more configuration.
Encore details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →