EMQXvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EMQX | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Messaging | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 16 869 | 118 130 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +5 771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | 6.3.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Erlang | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 78/100 for EMQX, so it is the safer default.
EMQX ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; EMQX needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 771 stars in 30 days).
EMQX details →TradingAgents details →