NATSvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NATS | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 20 956 | 118 088 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +191 | +5 729 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 80/100 for NATS, so it is the safer default.
NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 729 stars in 30 days).
NATS details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep NATS, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with