NATSvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NATS | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 20 956 | 25 407 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +191 | +85 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
NATS scores 80/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.
NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.
NATS is growing faster right now (+191 stars in 30 days).
NATS details →SpacetimeDB details →
Swap a project
Keep NATS, compare it with
Keep SpacetimeDB, compare it with