EMQXvsPrint Farm Manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EMQX | Print Farm Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Messaging | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 16 868 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 1 |
| Latest release | 6.3.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Erlang | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
EMQX scores 78/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
EMQX ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Print Farm Manager is easier to run; EMQX needs more configuration.
EMQX is growing faster right now (+114 stars in 30 days).
EMQX details →Print Farm Manager details →