elasticsearchvsUmlautAdaptarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| elasticsearch | UmlautAdaptarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Search Engines | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 78 429 | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +449 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 3 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
elasticsearch scores 84/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.
elasticsearch ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for UmlautAdaptarr.
If you want the quickest setup, UmlautAdaptarr is easier to run; elasticsearch needs more configuration.
elasticsearch is growing faster right now (+449 stars in 30 days).
elasticsearch details →UmlautAdaptarr details →
Swap a project
Keep elasticsearch, compare it with
Keep UmlautAdaptarr, compare it with