EGroupwarevsZulip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EGroupware | Zulip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 301 | 26 133 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +190 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 6 |
| Latest release | 23.1.20261021 · 21 Oct 2026 | 12.3 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Zulip scores 82/100 against 53/100 for EGroupware, so it is the safer default.
EGroupware ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Zulip.
If you want the quickest setup, Zulip is easier to run; EGroupware needs more configuration.
Zulip is growing faster right now (+190 stars in 30 days).
EGroupware details →Zulip details →
Swap a project
Keep EGroupware, compare it with
Keep Zulip, compare it with