EGroupwarevsProject N.O.M.A.D.
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EGroupware | Project N.O.M.A.D. | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 301 | 41 150 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 936 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 8 |
| Latest release | 23.1.20261021 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 53/100 for EGroupware, so it is the safer default.
EGroupware ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Project N.O.M.A.D..
If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; EGroupware needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 936 stars in 30 days).
EGroupware details →Project N.O.M.A.D. details →
Swap a project
Keep EGroupware, compare it with
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with