Egmavslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Egma | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #49 of 69 in AI Chat | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 145 | 156 109 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +918 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 43/100 for Egma, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Egma.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Egma needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+918 stars in 30 days).
Egma details →langflow details →
Swap a project
Keep Egma, compare it with
Keep langflow, compare it with