e2bvsytdlp_web_player
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | ytdlp_web_player | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 605 | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +647 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 8 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.
If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.
e2b is growing faster right now (+647 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →ytdlp_web_player details →