e2bvstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 14 603 | 16 649 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +645 | +250 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 49 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
e2b and trigger score the same (76/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 49 for trigger.
If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
e2b is growing faster right now (+645 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →trigger details →