e2bvsTorollo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | Torollo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 14 603 | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +645 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 10 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Torollo.
If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.
e2b is growing faster right now (+645 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →Torollo details →