e2bvsSuperset
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | Superset | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 14 596 | 75 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +658 | +447 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 25 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | superset-helm-chart-0.22.8 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Superset scores 88/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Superset.
If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; Superset needs more configuration.
e2b details →Superset details →