e2bvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 596 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +658 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 19 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for OpenReader.
e2b is growing faster right now (+658 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →OpenReader details →