e2bvsopen·kritt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | open·kritt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 14 605 | 2 380 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +647 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 5 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.
e2b is growing faster right now (+647 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →open·kritt details →