Dufsvsyoutube-dl-nas
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | youtube-dl-nas | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #27 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 998 | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 26.1029 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 50/100 for youtube-dl-nas, so it is the safer default.
youtube-dl-nas ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; youtube-dl-nas needs more configuration.
Dufs is growing faster right now (+49 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →youtube-dl-nas details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep youtube-dl-nas, compare it with