Dufsvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 10 995 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with