Dufsvstesserae
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | tesserae | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #14 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 10 999 | 984 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 78 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.480.0 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 51/100 for tesserae, so it is the safer default.
tesserae ships more often: 78 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; tesserae needs more configuration.
Dufs is growing faster right now (+50 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →tesserae details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep tesserae, compare it with