DufsvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 994 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Dufs details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with