DufsvsPulse
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 10 997 | 6 977 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +233 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 43 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
Pulse is growing faster right now (+233 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep Pulse, compare it with