DufsvsInfisical
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 996 | 30 109 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +710 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 79 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Infisical scores 78/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+710 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →Infisical details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep Infisical, compare it with