copypartyvsInfisical
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 170 | 30 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +397 | +715 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 79 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
copyparty details →Infisical details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Infisical, compare it with