drivebasevsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| drivebase | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 34 in File Management | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 594 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 19 |
| Latest release | v4.0.0 · 3 Jun 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 51/100 for drivebase, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for drivebase.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
drivebase details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep drivebase, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with