drivebasevsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| drivebase | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 594 | 65 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +313 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 15 |
| Latest release | v4.0.0 · 3 Jun 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 51/100 for drivebase, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for drivebase.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).
drivebase details →nocodb details →
Swap a project
Keep drivebase, compare it with
Keep nocodb, compare it with